In the changing political economy under digitalization, the future of work is being rewritten by data and algorithms. This year, our empirical research and policy engagement focused on Artificial Intelligence (AI) value chains and data work, underscoring the need for decent work standards, dignity, and meaningful work in the platform economy.
Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) has become a central focus of global policy discussions, but who does it actually serve? This year, we pushed back on the techno-solutionist narratives by advancing a public-value framework for DPIs, embedding accountability and collective rights into agricultural and health data governance debates, and bringing a critical Southern lens to conversations on democratic digital public infrastructure.
The dominant AI paradigm remains extractive — of data, labor, culture, and knowledge. This year, we worked to advance alternatives by shaping a new paradigm for AI innovation, championing more equitable and inclusive pathways to AI development, influencing debates on AI governance, and building feminist AI futures. Across these efforts, we sought to move AI discourse beyond Big Tech-led models towards more democratic, decentralized, socially grounded, and rights-based approaches that center people, communities, and planetary wellbeing.
At its core, data governance is about the exercise of power — yet the Global South has long been excluded from shaping the frameworks that govern it. This year, we advanced justice-oriented, sector-specific approaches to data governance and carried Southern aspirations of digital sovereignty into the rooms where global norms are being shaped.
Against the backdrop of the rise of trade as a key site of geopolitical contestation, we examined how emerging digital trade negotiations are reshaping regulatory trajectories in the digital economy. Through expert analysis and inputs, we called attention to the implications of these developments for digital governance in the Global South, advancing critical perspectives on digital sovereignty.
Big Tech's grip on digital markets is not just an economic problem — it's a democratic issue. This year, we influenced EU antitrust processes from a Global South lens and contributed expert inputs on platform regulation and competition law.
What does educational transformation look like when it is led by teachers and local contexts, rather than technology companies? We demonstrated that equitable digital education depends on public infrastructure, open resources, pedagogical purpose, and the agency of teachers to shape technology around the needs of their learners. Equity in education needs public digital infrastructure, not private platforms — and we continue to build the evidence for that.
From classrooms to policy spaces, we spent the year asking what technology should — and shouldn’t — do in education. We brought together a national ‘Critical EdTech’ community, strengthened research on multilingual and audio-based teacher development, and surfaced the risks of AI and unregulated, platform-driven education. Together, these efforts pushed for an education ecosystem where technology is accountable to teachers and learners, grounded in context, and designed around equity rather than commercial interests.
IMPACT AT A GLANCE FOR KISHORI ADDA
|
230+ |
Posts |
|
2.37L+ |
Views |
|
6.4K+ |
Likes |
|
2.2K+ |
Comments |
|
200+ |
Saves |
|
12.2K+ |
Shares |